Mother wins legal battle to stop father being told he has a child

Teenage mother who became pregnant when she was 13-year-old wins legal battle to stop violent drug addict father being told he has a child

  • A 14-year-old schoolgirl did not know she was pregnant until her waters broke
  • She feared what would happen if the father, who is 15, found out about the baby 
  • High Court judge Mr Justice Cohen agreed to her highly unusual request

A teenage mother who became pregnant aged just 13 has won an extraordinary court battle to stop the violent and drug-addicted father being told about the baby.

The schoolgirl, now 14, did not know she was pregnant until her waters broke and has since kept her baby girl a secret from all but her closest family. 

She feared what would happen if the father, who is 15, found out about the baby, who she now wants adopted, because of his history of violence.

The two teenagers had sex only on two occasions. Now a High Court judge has agreed to her highly unusual request that social workers do not tell the boy about his child.

A teenage mother who became pregnant at the age of 13 has won a court battle to stop the violent and drug-addicted father, who is 15, being told about the baby. (Stock image)

Mr Justice Cohen said: ‘I have reached the clear view that the combination of factors in this case does not make it appropriate for the father to be informed of the birth.’

The court, sitting in Newcastle, heard that the teenagers, who were at the same school, had an ‘extremely short-lived’ relationship. 

The girl was only 13 when she got pregnant and the father was a year older.

  • Ex-asylum seeker accused of being getaway driver after five…

    Fury as man is acquitted of raping teenage girl after her…

Share this article

She claims ‘she was unaware that she was pregnant until her waters broke’ – when she rang her family ‘in great distress’ – and that none of her friends or teachers had suspected a thing. 

Her baby was placed with foster carers as soon as she was discharged from hospital and is to be adopted, as the girl ‘immediately concluded that she could not care for [her]’.

Now a High Court judge has agreed to her highly unusual request that social workers do not tell the boy about his child. (Stock image)

The teenage girl was said by psychologists to be intelligent and wants to continue at school then go to university. 

She has a history of self-harm and depression, and was said to be ‘on edge’ and ‘constantly fearful of noises outside’ because she fears the father will ‘physically harm her’ if he finds out about the baby.

The father, who is said to be a drug addict and alcoholic who carries a knife, has been convicted of criminal damage, been permanently expelled from school and may have been violent to his own mother. 

He lives with his father, who also has drug problems and is known to be violent.

An independent expert consulted by the court said she ‘has not had a case like this in 18 years of experience’.

Mr Justice Cohen said that he had to consider the interests of the baby above all, and concluded that there was no hope of the boy or his family looking after her. 

He also pointed out the ‘very young age of the mother’, the effect on her life if the news gets out of her baby and the fact she is ‘psychologically vulnerable’. 

The judge said: ‘I have not taken the mother’s objections to the father being told at face value without analysis and it is significant that the views of the harm that the mother might suffer are supported by [a doctor], by her school pastoral tutor and the counsellor with whom she works, and that her complaints about the father and his family have been supported by local authority social service files relating to the paternal family.

‘In all the circumstances, I therefore order and direct that the local authority is not obliged to tell the father of the birth and should not do so.’


Source: Read Full Article

Widow in legal battle with stepson after he ‘threw her out of home’

Wealthy property investor’s widow, 57, is locked in bitter legal battle with stepson she helped raise after he ‘threw her out of their £450,000 home “like a dog”‘

  • Diane De Marzo, 57, says she lent £150k to Sonny Ball to help him find a home
  • Says it was for him and his girlfriend, now wife, Leahann, 33, after his father died 
  • The plan was she would share family property with them, Mrs De Marzo claims
  • But she says she was ‘thrown out’ of the house by Sonny and is now demanding that he give her the money back – but he claims the money was his inheritance

Diane De Marzo, 57, (pictured outside court) says she lent £150,000 to Sonny Ball, 33, to help him find a home for him and his girlfriend after his father died

A wealthy property investor’s widow who claims she was thrown out of her home ‘like a dog’ by her stepson has taken him to court.

Diane De Marzo, 57, says she lent £150,000 to Sonny Ball, 33, to help him find a home for him and his girlfriend and now wife, Leahann, 33, after his father died.

Mrs De Marzo claims the plan was she would share the property with them – but she says Sonny then threw her out of the house in Abbey Wood, Kent.

Demanding they sell the house and give her the money back, she now claims she was ‘scammed’ by Sonny, who she had always considered her ‘boy’.

‘He said I was like his ‘mum’ and he threw me out like a dog,’ Mrs De Marzo told Central London County Court.

‘In my eyes, he was ‘my boy’. His dad always believed he would do right by his family.’

But Sonny and his now wife say nothing could be further from the truth, that the money was a gift and represented his inheritance from his dad, Michael Ball.

  • Luxembourg prince enjoys six holidays a year and a rent-free…

    Scared to DEATH: Chilling moment ‘teenage burglars’ break…

Share this article

Mrs De Marzo has no right to any part of the three-bed £450,000 property as it is theirs alone, said the couple’s barrister Lina Mattsson.

She had been allowed to stay with them when she was in need, but was ‘obsessed’ with his father Michael Ball’s death to the point she was asked to leave.

But Sonny and his now wife Leahann (both pictured outside court) say that the money was a gift and represented his inheritance from his dad, Michael Ball

‘They were finding it more and more difficult to live with Mrs De Marzo,’ said the barrister.

‘She was obsessed with how Michael Ball had died, claiming it was murder or suicide. She talked about the circumstances of his death all the time.

‘Sonny was finding it very difficult to cope with the tension at home. He tried to avoid her, staying away.

‘The situation was becoming unbearable and, on 23 May 2015, they asked Mrs De Marzo to leave the property.’

Ms Mattsson said that it was only after that row that Mrs De Marzo started claiming Sonny had ‘stolen her money’ and that she had a claim to the house.

‘She turned Sonny’s younger sisters against him, telling them that he had stolen their money,’ she continued

The house which is at the centre of a dispute between the Balls and Mrs De Marzo

‘She emailed Sonny and Leahann, attaching an accident report with horrible photographs of Sonny’s dead father.’

But in her evidence, Mrs De Marzo – who has known Sonny since he was five years old – insisted that the money was not a gift.

Had she given £150,000 to Sonny, it would have meant less ultimately going to her husband’s four other children, three of whom he had with her.

‘I need to look after all the children,’ she told Judge Simon Monty QC. ‘Sonny can’t just have £150,000 all to himself.’

She said when the property was bought, she had insisted that Sonny and Leahann draw up wills to ensure the £150,000 went back to her if they died first.

Her barrister, Piers Hill, said the arrangement had always been that Mrs De Marzo would live in the property with the couple.

She paid the broadband bill for a year and funded an extension to the driveway so her car could fit, he said.

But Leahann Ball insisted that the £150,000 was Sonny’s inheritance and that her step-mother-in-law has no right to the house.

‘If she had wanted the property to be jointly owned, then that’s what it would have been,’ she said. ‘We would have gone to buy a house three ways.

‘She wanted to see Sonny settled, it was what his dad wanted. By giving him the £150,000, she didn’t have to worry about him anymore.’

The court heard Mrs De Marzo and Michael Ball moved to Spain in 2006, where Mr Ball owned a string of properties.

Sonny initially went with them but returned to England in 2007 and now lives with Leahann in the disputed property in Abbey Wood.

His father, who died in a road accident in 2013, owned a large family villa, a rental house and two beachside apartments in southern Spain, plus a flat in Kent.

Judge Monty will rule on the case at a later date.

Source: Read Full Article

Secret legal advice on Brexit will be published within hours but ministers warns rebel MPs they'll 'live to regret it'

Commons leader Andrea Leadsom confirmed the advice they tried to keep secret would indeed be published this morning after a humiliating defeat last night.

MPs voted to defy the Government and release the full documents – rather than just a summary.

It was just one of three votes Theresa May's administration lost last night, and marks the first ever time ministers in a British Parliament has been found in contempt.

But Ms Leadsom said this morning: "I think any parliamentarian who wants at some point in the future to be in Government is going to live to regret their vote last night."

She said it undermined "decades if not centuries of convention" where ministers were able to receive advice in secret.

And she would only back Mrs May as PM "at the moment".

The Prime Minister will face PMQs in the Commons later today, followed by the continuation of the debate on her Brexit deal.

MPs will have their crunch vote on it next week – where the PM is all but certain to lose.

The news comes as:

  • The Sun revealed the Chancellor had set aside £2billion more in funding for a No Deal Brexit
  • The head-to-head between Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May on the BBC was scrapped after failing to agree on how to do it
  • MPs warned she has only once chance to save her Brexit deal – buy fixing the hated Northern Irish backstop
Getty Images – Getty2
Theresa May suffered three humiliating defeats over Brexit last night

Ms Leadsom said today that if the PM's deal was thrown out in the vote next week, Britain would leave without a deal.

Other MPs are determined to stop that happening, saying there's no majority for that to pass in the Commons.

"Unless government were to do something completely different to change tack, or indeed to pass this deal, then we will be leaving the EU on 29 March next year without a deal, so it defaults to no deal," Ms Leadsom said this morning.

Last night MPs won the power to block No Deal and call a second referendum if the PM lost the vote.

  • GOT a story? RING The Sun on 0207 782 4104 or WHATSAPP on 07423720250 or EMAIL [email protected]



Source: Read Full Article