What Mega Millions winner plans to do with some of her $1.5 billion fortune

The $1.5 billion Mega Millions jackpot winner came across her history-making lottery prize when she decided to go on a scenic drive during down-time on a trip to Greenville, South Carolina, her attorney said.

Interested in Lottery?

That’s when she drove past a KC Mart, and when its signs about the jackpot caught her eye, she stopped in to buy a ticket, Jason Kurland, the attorney, said in a Thursday statement.

“After checking her ticket the morning after the drawing, she was in complete shock and disbelief,” Kurland said. “She stared motionless at the ticket for what felt like hours, then came the jumping and screams of joy.”

The sole winner of the $1.5 billion Mega Millions jackpot from October 2018 came forward to claim her prize last week.

The winner, a South Carolina woman who chose to remain anonymous, selected the cash option of a one-time payment of $877,784,124. The payout is the largest to a single winner in U.S. history.

“Words can’t describe the feeling of such incredible luck,” the winner said in a statement released by her attorney Thursday. “I do realize that such good fortune carries a tremendous social responsibility, and it gives me a unique opportunity to assist, support and contribute to charities and causes that are close to my heart.”

Kurland said the winner is donating money to the Ronald McDonald House of Charities of Columbia, South Carolina, the Red Cross Alabama Region’s tornado relief fund, the city of Simpsonville, South Carolina, Art Center, the One SC Fund for Hurricane Florence relief, and In The Middle, a Columbia, South Carolina, charity for women undergoing breast cancer treatment.

ABC News’ Jenn Leong, Janice McDonald and Bill Hutchinson contributed to this report.

Source: Read Full Article

Fast-moving storm bringing snow, rain to Northeast

The storm that brought 10 reported tornadoes to five states in the South and heavy snow to Minnesota and the Dakotas on Saturday is quickly moving through the Midwest, Mid-Atlantic and Northeast on Sunday.

Interested in Weather?

The snow is stretching from Minnesota to New York on Sunday morning, while it is lightening in parts of the Upper Midwest. However, there are two factors that will limit snowfall totals in the Northeast. First, mild air is quickly moving into the region and will prevent any significant impacts in the Interstate 95 corridor during the morning. Secondly, the storm is moving fast.

Some snow will move through New England during the morning hours, but mild air will quickly change much of the Northeast over to mixing and then some rain. The storm will be out of the region by mid- to late-afternoon.

Snowfall totals in parts of the Northeast away from the major cities could exceed 2 to 4 inches Sunday morning — especially in some of the higher elevations in parts of New York, and northwest Connecticut. About an inch, along with some ice, is possible in areas like Hartford, Connecticut, and Springfield, Massachusetts. Nearly no accumulation is expected in New York City or Boston.

Gusty winds will impact parts of the Midwest from Chicago to Detroit behind the storm.

New storm developing in West

A new storm is moving along the shoreline of California on Sunday and will bring some rain to the coast line and some snow to the higher elevations outside Los Angeles. Through Sunday night, 4 to 8 inches of snow is possible in the Ventura Mountains, and 1 to 2 inches of snow could fall near Grapevine, California. Travel along Interstate 5 could be affected.

A part of this system will move inland into the Southwest on Monday and Tuesday and start to bring in heavy rain to parts of Arizona and New Mexico. Localized flooding is possible with some of the more intense rain showers.

The storm will strengthen and begin to organize in the middle of the week. Initially it will usher in a good amount of moisture to parts of the Southern Plains on Tuesday.

Then, by Tuesday night and early Wednesday, the storm will begin to rapidly intensify and reorganize itself as it moves off the Rocky Mountains and into the central U.S.

This will likely bring a round of severe weather in the Southern Plains. Steady and heavy rain will overspread much of the central U.S. — even in parts of Minnesota where they just received 6 to 12 inches of snow this weekend.

Source: Read Full Article

What happened when a Texas doctor was killed in an alleged murder-for-hire plot

When a Texas doctor was found shot and stabbed to death, an investigation found that he might have been the victim of an alleged murder-for-hire plot by his girlfriend’s apparently jealous ex.

In 2012, Dr. Joseph Sonnier, a Lubbock, Texas, pathologist, was found murdered in his own home. Dr. Thomas Michael Dixon, a plastic surgeon from Amarillo, Texas, was eventually convicted of the murder in 2015.

Prosecutors argued that Dixon paid his friend David Shepard to stalk and then kill Sonnier because he was jealous that Sonnier was dating Dixon’s former girlfriend Richelle Shetina.

Though Dixon was found guilty and sentenced to life in prison without parole, he appealed, and his conviction was overturned in 2018. Today, Dixon, who was released on bond, is awaiting his retrial.

From the moment Dixon and Shetina first met to Dixon’s release from prison, here is a timeline highlighting some of the key events in the case.


Richelle Shetina meets Dr. Thomas Dixon after visiting Sensi Med Spa in Amarillo, Texas, for Botox injections. Dixon was the owner of the spa and administered the shots. They become friends on Facebook and developed a friendly relationship.


Shetina and Dixon begin an affair. His wife finds out and quickly files for divorce. The couple begins dating exclusively but Shetina recalls their relationship as rocky. At one point, the defense would argue at trial, that Shetina thought Dixon might propose, but he bought her a tea-of-the-month club subscription instead. After months of highs and lows, Shetina breaks it off with Dixon.


Shetina begins taking dance classes at D’Venue Dance Studio in Lubbock, Texas, in July 2011, where she meets a tall, handsome pathologist named Dr. Joseph Sonnier. Their friendship quickly turns into a romance that Shetina describes as the love of her life.

While Dixon is desperate to get back with Shetina, she lets him know by text message in September 2011 that she is now in love with her dance partner. The defense argued that Shetina was playing a cruel game and leading Dixon on.

Shetina and Dixon meet in person for the last time on Oct. 31, 2011. Shetina says Sonnier, then her boyfriend at the time, was aware of the meeting and that she decided to meet Dixon to show him that she was over him and never coming back.

February 2012

Shetina and Sonnier continue dating, taking trips to Los Angeles and a romantic vacation to Paris for her 50th birthday. While Shetina says they were very much in love, strange things seemed to be happening.

She says she felt like she was being watched at her local gym, and in February 2012, she came home to an odd note claiming to be from an ex-girlfriend of Sonnier. Shetina said Sonnier thought that it must be someone trying to “drive a wedge” between them.

July 2012

Dr. Joseph Sonnier is stabbed and shot to death on July 10, 2012, as he arrives home from work. His body isn’t discovered until the next day when landscapers arrived to do work at the home.

Later that week, a man named Paul Reynolds contacts police and tells them that the man he is staying with, David Shepard, mentions that he killed someone in Lubbock. Reynolds tells police he did an online search and found information about Sonnier’s death, and thought he might have been Shepard’s victim.

Later, when police questioned him, Shepard said his friend Dixon paid him three silver bars and gave a box of expensive Cuban cigars in return for killing Sonnier. Pawn shop records show that David Shepard had cashed silver bars the day after the murder.

July 16, 2012

Dixon is arrested in connection with the killing, the same day the Sonnier family held the funeral for their father in Shreveport, Louisiana.

Oct. 27, 2014

Dixon’s first trial begins with the prosecution using David Shepard, who had already given them a lengthy confession, as their star witness. Shepard, who is pictured above, had accepted a plea deal to testify against Dixon in exchange for pleading no contest to the charge of capital murder and avoiding the death penalty. He is currently serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole. As part of his plea deal with prosecutors, Shepard waived his right to appeal his conviction.

But on the stand, Shepard surprises everyone and changes his story. He now claims that Dixon was not involved in the murder at all and that he acted alone. The defense argued that Dixon only asked Shepard to take photographs of Sonnier out with other women with the intent to show his ex-girlfriend, Richelle Shetina, but he never wanted Sonnier dead. They also said the silver bars Dixon gave to Shepard was part of a business investment for a company they were starting together.

The trial ends in a hung jury and the judge declares a mistrial.

October 2015

Almost one year to the day later, testimony begins in Dixon’s re-trial for murder. The prosecution does not put David Shepard on the stand this time, but rather his house guest, Paul Reynolds, who recounts his story about staying with Shepard. But perhaps the most powerful testimony of all for the prosecution comes from David Shepard’s own daughter, Haley Shepard, who testifies that she believes her father lied on the stand in the first trial to protect his friend, Dixon.

Nov. 18, 2015

Dixon is found guilty on two counts of capital murder and is sentenced to life in prison without parole. His defense plans to appeal the verdict.

Dec. 13, 2018

The 7th District Court of Appeals in Amarillo, Texas, reverses Dixon’s conviction and grants him a new trial after his reviewing his appeal.

Jan. 17, 2019

Dixon’s bail is set at $2 million bond.

Jan. 28, 2019

Dixon is released from prison on a $2 million bond as he waits for a retrial.

Source: Read Full Article

‘Centuries of entitlement’: Emma Thompson on why she quit Lasseter film

When the actor Emma Thompson quit the forthcoming animation Luck last month, many assumed it was because John Lasseter had been announced as the new head of Skydance Media, the production company behind the film. This was confirmed by her publicist, but a letter shared with the Los Angeles Times on Tuesday makes plain Thompson’s level of discomfort.

In it, she raises questions about the ethical implications of working with Lasseter, who left Pixar last year following multiple allegations of inappropriate behaviour. Her implication is that Lasseter’s admitting to “inappropriate hugging” and “other missteps” was insufficient, and that it would be reasonable for women who now work with him to question whether he would act appropriately because he realised the error of his ways or because it was politic to do so.

Thompson concludes by expressing regret about quitting the production, but determining the alternative would be irresponsible for someone in her position.

“I am well aware that centuries of entitlement to women’s bodies whether they like it or not is not going to change overnight. Or in a year,” she writes. “But I am also aware that if people who have spoken out – like me – do not take this sort of a stand then things are very unlikely to change at anything like the pace required to protect my daughter’s generation.”

The Guardian contacted Skydance, which declined to comment.

The full text of Thompson’s letter is below.

As you know, I have pulled out of the production of Luck – to be directed by the very wonderful Alessandro Carloni. It feels very odd to me that you and your company would consider hiring someone with Mr Lasseter’s pattern of misconduct given the present climate in which people with the kind of power that you have can reasonably be expected to step up to the plate.

I realise that the situation – involving as it does many human beings – is complicated. However these are the questions I would like to ask:

If a man has been touching women inappropriately for decades, why would a woman want to work for him if the only reason he’s not touching them inappropriately now is that it says in his contract that he must behave “professionally”?

If a man has made women at his companies feel undervalued and disrespected for decades, why should the women at his new company think that any respect he shows them is anything other than an act that he’s required to perform by his coach, his therapist and his employment agreement? The message seems to be, “I am learning to feel respect for women so please be patient while I work on it. It’s not easy.”

Much has been said about giving John Lasseter a “second chance”. But he is presumably being paid millions of dollars to receive that second chance. How much money are the employees at Skydance being paid to GIVE him that second chance?

If John Lasseter started his own company, then every employee would have been given the opportunity to choose whether or not to give him a second chance. But any Skydance employees who don’t want to give him a second chance have to stay and be uncomfortable or lose their jobs. Shouldn’t it be John Lasseter who has to lose HIS job if the employees don’t want to give him a second chance?

Skydance has revealed that no women received settlements from Pixar or Disney as a result of being harassed by John Lasseter. But given all the abuse that’s been heaped on women who have come forward to make accusations against powerful men, do we really think that no settlements means that there was no harassment or no hostile work environment? Are we supposed to feel comforted that women who feel that their careers were derailed by working for Lasseter DIDN’T receive money?

I hope these queries make the level of my discomfort understandable. I regret having to step away because I love Alessandro so much and think he is an incredibly creative director. But I can only do what feels right during these difficult times of transition and collective consciousness raising.

I am well aware that centuries of entitlement to women’s bodies whether they like it or not is not going to change overnight. Or in a year. But I am also aware that if people who have spoken out – like me – do not take this sort of a stand then things are very unlikely to change at anything like the pace required to protect my daughter’s generation.

Yours most sincerely,

Emma Thompson

Source: Read Full Article

Don’t call Howard Schultz a billionaire. He’s just a ‘person of means’

Howard Schultz is worth around $3.4bn. While one might think that would make the former Starbucks CEO and would-be presidential candidate a “billionaire”, he would prefer you didn’t use that term. You see, while billionaire may seem like a simple descriptor, it is actually a disgusting slur.

Schultz enlightened us as to the problematic nature of the b-word at a book event in New York last Monday. When asked by New York Times columnist Andrew Ross Sorkin whether he thought billionaires had become too powerful in American life, the coffee magnate complained that “the moniker billionaire now has become the catchphrase”. Rather than using a word like billionaire to describe a person with billions of dollars, Schultz suggested it may be better to use expressions like “people of means” or “people of wealth”.

Sorry, Howard Schultz – America doesn’t want another billionaire president | Luke Savage

Poor Schultz. He was just trying to help us all out; generously digging into his rich vocabulary and spreading the semantic wealth. However, after footage of the interview went viral this week, the businessman has been mercilessly mocked. People of mean spirit have been suggesting their own alternatives to billionaire such as “robber barons”, “cash vampires”, and various other phrases that are probably too rude to repeat.

While Schultz’s clumsy attempt to rebrand the term billionaire is amusing, it’s also instructive. You see, what he unsuccessfully tried to do in that interview is what the super-rich have successfully been doing for a very long time: justifying their unjustifiable fortunes by deploying strategic euphemisms. Spinning inequality with disingenuous synonyms. You could call it “wealth-washing”.

Take, for example, the term philanthropist, which means “a rich person who doesn’t want to pay tax or fair wages but does want to get applauded for giving a bit of money to a charity of their choice now and again”. The uber-rich have done a great job of rebranding tax avoidance as philanthropy over the years – a charade the Dutch historian Rutger Bregman recently went viral for pointing out. Speaking on a panel at Davos, Bregman argued that industry had to “stop talking about philanthropy and start talking about taxes.” Bregman said he was flabbergasted no one at Davos was talking about tax avoidance. “It feels like I’m at a firefighters conference and no one’s allowed to speak about water.”

‘This is about saving capitalism’: the Dutch historian who savaged Davos elite

Another key talking point used in wealth-washing is the promise of trickle-down economics. An idea which keeps getting parroted despite the inconvenient truth that the rich keep getting richer and the poor keep getting poorer. Indeed, a recent report by Oxfam found that the richest 26 people in the world own as much as the poorest 50%. Still, even with the facts clearly against them, the rich and powerful still promote the idea that we all benefit when a few individuals and corporations get obscenely wealthy. After Bregman’s comments on tax avoidance at Davos, for example, Ken Goldman, the former Yahoo chief financial officer, pushed back by talking about record employment. But as Winnie Byanyima, an Oxfam executive director, noted, “employment” can be a rhetorical trick. “You’re counting the wrong things,” she said. “You’re not counting dignity of people. You’re counting exploited people.”

Another fig-leaf the super-rich frequently hide behind in order to justify inequality is the idea that they are “self-made”. This implies that they have earned their fortune, that they deserve it. It implies that any one of us could be a billionaire if we just worked hard enough. It removes responsibility from the system and focuses it on the individual. Indeed, Schultz used the self-made argument in an MSNBC interview last month. “I’ve also been criticized for being a billionaire,” Schultz said. But “I’m self-made. I grew up in the projects in Brooklyn, New York. I thought that was the American dream. You’re going to criticize me for being successful?”

Let’s give Schultz his due – unlike Trump, who likes to pretend he is self-made, he didn’t inherit millions from his father. But while he certainly worked hard, nobody is self-made. As Schultz notes, he grew up in federally subsidized housing in New York; taxes helped pay for his housing. That is what taxes are for; to provide a safety net that gives everyone a chance to succeed, no matter where they start out. To provide the bootstraps by which people can pull themselves up. And yet, despite benefiting from welfare policies, billionaires like Schultz are outraged about the idea that people who earn more than $10m should pay a 70% marginal tax rate. I would call that mean and greedy, but I’m sure Schultz would prefer that I called it “a rational response from people of means”.

Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist

Source: Read Full Article

How a 10-year-old boy found murdered in 1998 was finally identified

A 10-year-old boy found murdered in North Carolina in 1998 has finally been identified, according to officials, who have since learned the boy’s mother was also found dead that same year one state away.

Interested in ?

On Sept. 25, 1998, a lawn maintenance crew found the remains of the child — now identified as Robert “Bobby” Adam Whitt — under a billboard in Mebane, North Carolina. At the time, no matches were made to known missing children, officials with the Orange County, North Carolina, Sheriff’s Office said Tuesday.

Efforts to identify the boy included a rendering created by a Smithsonian forensic anthropologist, a bust created by a forensic sculptor and publicity on the TV show “America’s Most Wanted,” officials said — to no avail.

Through DNA technology advancements over the years, it was determined Bobby was “first-generation, biracial Caucasian and Asian,” officials said, and analysts were able to create a facial reconstruction.

Then, a genetic genealogy consultant successfully found a relative of the unknown boy, and investigators reached out to family members, officials said.

In December 2018, a relative responded to a message from investigators and provided the boy’s name and “critical details related to the case,” officials said.

“Investigators determined a strong possibility existed that the child’s mother had also been killed during the same time period,” officials said. “With the assistance of NCMEC (National Center for Missing and Exploited Children), an unidentified deceased female matching the search criteria was located in Spartanburg County [in South Carolina].”

Their DNA was compared, officials said, and Bobby and slain woman were confirmed to be mother and son.

Bobby’s mother, Myoung Hwa Cho, was found strangled to death in Spartanburg County on May 13, 1998, officials said.

After Orange County Sheriff’s officials reached out about Bobby’s case, Spartanburg County used fingerprints to identity her, according to authorities.

Cho’s husband, who is Bobby’s father, has since “confessed to the murder of both victims within several months of each other in 1998,” Spartanburg County officials said.

The suspect, who was not identified, is already behind bars in “long-term incarceration” on unrelated federal charges, Orange County Sheriff’s officials said.
According to The Raleigh News & Observer, he’s serving an armed robbery sentence and is up for parole in 2037.

When Bobby and his mother left their home in Ohio, family members weren’t suspicious because they thought the boy and his mother had moved to South Korea, where Cho was from, according to the Raleigh News & Observer.

Bobby was born in Michigan and raised in Ohio, according to officials.

Family members were shocked to hear they were killed and now “our hearts are broken into a million pieces,” relatives said in a statement, ABC Raleigh station WTVD reported. “Bobby was the sweetest, kindest, and funniest little boy. He always had a smile on his face and a twinkle in his eye. And to think of that being snuffed out brings a chill to our hearts.”

It appears neither killing occurred where the bodies were found, Spartanburg County officials said.

“Once jurisdictional issues are addressed,” charging can begin in this case, Orange County Sheriff’s officials said.

Source: Read Full Article

Women’s March leader defends controversial relationship with Louis Farrakhan

The co-president of the upcoming Women’s March defended her relationship with National of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan over his alleged anti-Semitism and other rhetoric on the “The View” Monday.

When Tamika Mallory visited the co-hosts, she explained her relationship with the controversial black leader.

“As a leader, as a black leader in a country that is still dealing with some very serious unresolved issues as it relates to the black experience in this country, I go into a lot of difficult spaces,” Mallory told “The View.” “Wherever my people are, there that’s where I must also be.”

Mallory has faced backlash for her association with Farrakhan. In March 2017, and she responded with an article saying: “I am the same person today that I was before … which begs the question – why are my beliefs being questioned now?”

Farrakhan has been described by the Southern Poverty Law Center, among others, as an “extremist” “anti-Semite.”

He has made comments that have been perceived as anti-Semitic in the past, including blaming Jews for “the horror of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, plantation slavery, Jim Crow, sharecropping,” and describing the state of Israel as “wicked.”

In October, he made headlines again in a Tweet, saying, “I’m not an anti-Semite. I’m anti-Termite.”

Mallory also discussed her choice to post a picture of herself with Farrakhan on Instagram in May 2017, calling him “the GOAT,” short for “the greatest of all time.”

Thank God this man is still alive and doing well. He is definitely the GOAT. Happy Birthday @louisfarrakhan! ?????

A post shared by Tamika D. Mallory (@tamikadmallory) on May 11, 2017 at 1:06pm PDT

The relationship sparked a fiery exchange between Mallory and the “View” co-hosts.

“Why call him the greatest of all time?” Sunny Hostin asked.

“I didn’t call him the greatest of all time because of his rhetoric,” Mallory responded. “I called him the greatest of all time because of what he’s done in black communities.”

“You’re talking about women, you should be talking about all women, including Jewish women and conservative women,” co-host Meghan McCain said. “Do you condemn Farrakhan’s remarks about Jewish people?”

“We didn’t make those remarks,” Mallory responded. “I don’t agree with many of Minister Farrakhan’s statements.”

McCain asked, “Do you condemn them?”

“I don’t agree with these statements,” Mallory responded. “It’s not my language, it’s not the way that I speak, it’s not how I organize … I should never be judged through the lens of a man.”

Mallory also discussed attending Savior’s Day — a holiday for the Nation of Islam — and compared it to her visits to prisons, where she said also works to “build that unity, bring them to a place where we live in a more fair and equitable society.”

Mallory also said the Women’s March was comparably difficult: “I met with a lot of women who did not even understand why race was important to be a part of the conversation as it relates to women’s rights issues… just because you go into a space with someone does not mean that you agree with everything that they say.”

“That work is not easy for everyone to understand but it’s certainly work that I’m committed to,” she added. “And everywhere I go is difficult.”

Mallory responded to critics saying she should step down from her role as co-president of the Women’s March: “I am willing to lead until my term at Women’s March is up.”

Mallory’s co-president Bob Bland responded to allegations that the organization expressed anti-Semitic beliefs behind closed doors, saying the claims “are not true. That is not how that meeting happened.”

“The people that the journalist spoke to did not tell the truth, period, full stop,” Bland said. “The Women’s March unequivocally condemns anti-Semitism, bigotry, transphobia… We condemn any statements of hate.”

“We’re committed to repairing any harm,” she added. “We welcome pro-life, we welcome conservative women to the Women’s March. The Women’s March is open for all.”

Source: Read Full Article

Parole fugitive suspected of gunning down officer was shot by the alleged victim

A parole fugitive suspected of gunning down a young Provo, Utah, police officer was shot and injured during the confrontation by his alleged victim, according to police.

Officer Joseph Shinners, 29, was trying to apprehend the parole fugitive, who had active warrants for his arrest, in the nearby town of Orem when he was shot Saturday night, authorities said.

Shinners managed to return fire, striking his suspected killer, identified as parole fugitive Matt Frank Hoover, authorities said.

Shinners died at a hospital late Saturday night, Provo Police Chief Richard Ferguson said.

Fellow officers apprehended the injured suspect that night and took him to a hospital where he remains under guard, authorities said.

Hoover, whose lengthy arrest record includes drug and theft charges, is in stable condition, Orem Police Lt. Trent Colledge told ABC News Tuesday.

Hoover allegedly made recent threats of violence toward police, authorities said.

He is expected to be charged with aggravated murder, attempted aggravated murder, possession of a weapon by a restricted person and possession of methamphetamine with a prior history, Colledge said. No court date has been set at this time, Colledge said.

Colledge called Shinners’ slaying a “tragedy.”

“He is no longer with us because a wanted fugitive did not want to go back to prison,” Colledge told ABC News via email. “He was an outstanding Officer that was just trying to make the community a safer place for all of us. We will forever remember the ultimate sacrifice he gave on that dreadful night.”

Shinners, a Massachusetts native who was on the job for three years, is survived by his wife and 1-year-old son, Provo police said.

Shinners came from a family of service. His brother is a police officer and his father was a fire captain in Everett, Massachusetts.

His funeral will be held Saturday, the Provo police said.

Source: Read Full Article

As a major Pacific storm heads east, 2 more head for the West Coast

A massive Pacific storm over the weekend brought powerful wind, torrential rain and heavy snow to the western U.S., causing widespread power outages, major travel delays and a mudslide near Malibu, California, near where the Woolsey Fire recently burned through.

Interested in Weather?

In the Seattle metro area, winds topped 60 mph and resulted in thousands of power outages on Sunday, as more than a foot of snow fell in the Sierra Nevada. Mountains outside of Salt Lake City saw more than 2 feet.

More heavy rain in the Bay Area created flooding on Sunday night, following strong wind and high tides on Saturday. This powerful storm has moved east as part of an active pattern delivering winter weather coast to coast in the next few days.

After getting out from under that major Pacific storm, the West Coast is expecting two more this week. More rain and snow are expected, as whiteout conditions are possible today in the Sierra Nevada, where total snow accumulations from the weekend through today could top 4 feet.

The next Pacific storm is due to arrive early later on Tuesday and could be a tad wetter. Heavy rain is expected in much of Northern California and the Northwest, with more snow forecast for the mountains. Rainfall totals of 2 to 4 inches will be possible.

The following Pacific storm is lurking near the Aleutian Islands off Alaska. That storm’s potential impact isn’t clear at this time.

This morning, that storm that just left the Pacific is delivering wintry precipitation to parts of the upper Midwest, with a foot of snow possible today on parts of Michigan’s upper peninsula.

The storm is expected to quickly slide off to the east today and deliver snow to New England by Tuesday morning, with snow and a wintry mix possible throughout the suburbs of New York and Philadelphia. The major cities are more likely to see just rain.

Snowfall totals should remain light across much of the Northeast, but a few areas could see 3 to 6 inches locally, leading to travel issues.

Source: Read Full Article