Brexit trade war fears mount as ministers ‘get legal green light to scrap Northern Ireland protocol’ – while Liz Truss holds last-ditch talks with EU chief
- Fears of trade war with the EU are mounting amid wrangling over the NI protocol
- Foreign Secretary Liz Truss is holding talks with Maros Sefcovic this morning
- Attorney General is said to have advised that it would be legal to axe the NI rules
Fears over a Brexit trade war are mounting today as Liz Truss holds last-ditch talks with the EU – after ministers were advised they can legally scrap the Northern Ireland protocol.
The Foreign Secretary is speaking to commission vice-president Maros Sefcovic as the standoff escalates in the wake of Stormont elections.
Attorney General Suella Braverman is said to have concluded that it would be legal to axe swathes of the post-Brexit rules for the province because they are causing social unrest.
There have been claims that Boris Johnson is ready to trigger the move within days, despite warnings from the US and Europe against unilateral action.
Foreign Secretary Liz Truss (right) is speaking to commission vice-president Maros Sefcovic (left) as the standoff escalates in the wake of Stormont elections
Attorney General Suella Braverman is said to have concluded that it would be legal to axe swathes of the post-Brexit rules for the province because they are causing social unrest
Sectarian tensions have been rising in Northern Ireland, while Sinn Fein became the biggest party for the first time in elections last week
The PM insisted yesterday that the Good Friday Agreement is more important than the Northern Ireland Protocol, as he dismissed suggestions of any possible escalatory response from the EU as ‘crazy’.
He said there was no need for ‘drama’ as he strengthened hints that he could override elements of the deal.
Ms Truss is expected to tell EC vice president Mr Sefcovic that the dispute over Northern Ireland cannot drag on.
She had warned she would ‘not shy away’ from taking action as she accused the EU of proposing solutions that would ‘take us backwards’.
Ms Braverman has reportedly advised that legislation to override the protocol would be legally sound because of the ‘disproportionate and unreasonable’ way it has been implemented by the EU.
She has submitted evidence accusing the EU of undermining the Good Friday Agreement by creating a trade barrier in the Irish Sea, and warned of ‘societal unrest’ in Northern Ireland.
However, there are signs of tensions in the Cabinet over the step, with Michael Gove and Rishi Sunak said to be concerned about the impact on the economy amid the Ukraine war and cost-of-living crisis.
Mr Gove stressed yesterday he was ‘super-cool’ with the approach being taken by Ms Truss.
Mr Johnson played down the risks yesterday, telling BBC News: ‘Let’s face it, we’re talking about really, in the scheme of things, a very, very small part of the whole European economy, and I think 0.4 per cent of the value of the whole of the EU economy in Northern Ireland.
‘It is crazy. I didn’t think there’s any need for drama. This is something that just needs to be fixed.’
Speaking to ITV’s Peston programme, Jacob Rees-Mogg said the UK would not involve itself in any trade war with the EU.
‘Tit-for-tat retaliation of that kind is the economics of the schoolground and it would damage British consumers at a time of rising (prices),’ he said.
Irish foreign minister Simon Coveney said this morning that Brussels wanted ‘compromise’.
But he warned: ‘Clearly, if the UK breaches international law, if it undermines a protocol that is about protecting the integrity of the EU single market, then the EU can’t ignore that.’
He told RTE radio that there was still a ‘landing zone’ for an agreement between the two sides.
‘We’re not going to do it under the threat of British Government’s language and briefing of the media which says if the EU doesn’t give us everything we want, well, then we’re going to legislate ourselves to override international law,’ he said.
Northern Ireland minister Conor Burns last night that the UK Government would have to take unilateral action over the protocol if it could not resolve issues with the EU.
Speaking to LBC’s Tonight With Andrew Marr programme, he said: ‘If the EU are saying to us that, and they’re not, I don’t think, yet at the position of saying there’s nothing more to talk about, then we will have to take actions to prioritise stability in Northern Ireland, powersharing in Northern Ireland, to protect the institutions of the Good Friday Agreement, and that will mean intervention unilaterally, yes.’
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has said: ‘No-one should unilaterally cancel, break or in any way attack the settlement.’
The White House stressed the need for talks to continue to resolve the issues, with a spokesman saying: ‘The best path forward is a pragmatic one that requires courage, co-operation and leadership.
‘We urge the parties to continue engaging in dialogue to resolve differences and bring negotiations to a successful conclusion.’
Democratic Unionist Party leader Sir Jeffrey Donaldson reiterated his call for the Government to take action.
Boris Johnson (pictured in Sweden yesterday) insisted that the Good Friday Agreement is more important than the Northern Ireland Protocol, as he dismissed suggestions of any possible escalatory response from the EU as ‘crazy’
He told Sky News: ‘The protocol is harming Northern Ireland, it’s harming our economy, it is undermining political stability here, so I think in those circumstances, and in order to safeguard the Belfast or Good Friday Agreement and political institutions, the UK Government is well within its rights to act in these circumstances.’
Officials working for Ms Truss are drawing up draft legislation to unilaterally remove the need for checks on all goods being sent from Britain for use in Northern Ireland.
Ms Truss is understood to be poised to take further action in coming weeks if negotiations with the EU continue to stall.
The proposed law would allow businesses in Northern Ireland to disregard EU rules and regulations and remove the power of the European Court of Justice to rule on issues relating to the region.
Crucially, it would in parts override the protocol agreed by Mr Johnson in 2019 and mean the UK had breached its obligations under the Brexit agreement.
But it has been argued that the protocol will not be completely overridden, with measures being considered to ease the issues on the ground in Northern Ireland.
Source: Read Full Article