CHELSEA have been called "embarrassing" after their new home kit was released without a sponsor.
The Blues unveiled their retro 2023-24 home shirt despite still being in the hunt for a replacement for previous sponsor Three.
The West Londoners' £40m a season deal with the mobile phone provider expired at the end of last season.
Todd Boehly and Co had negotiated a deal with streaming platform Paramount+, which was vetoed by the Premier League.
Prem chiefs deemed that the partnership could upset rights holders by promoting a rival.
Chelsea were then set to enter a deal with gambling company Stake.
Read More Football Stories
Kepa marries stunning Miss Universe Spain Wag with Chelsea pals as guests
Get the best free spins bonuses with our guide to the top casino deals
But this fell through due to a fan backlash.
Prem clubs will be banned from having gambling companies as shirt sponsors from the 2026-27 season onwards.
Amid their sponsorship dilemma, Chelsea have released their new kit without one – although the launch came with a caveat.
The new home shirt will not be available to fans until August 16 at the earliest – after the Blues have already kicked off their Premier League campaign.
Most read in Football
Bayern make £80million Kane offer, Pochettino to hold talks with Chelsea star
BBC presenter Emma Louise Jones joins no bra club and sends fans into meltdown
Spurs to play hardball over Harry Kane as 'Bayern Munich launch second bid'
How China's football boom collapsed – and what it means for Saudi Arabia
BETTING SPECIAL – BEST NO DEPOSIT CASINO OFFERS
Chelsea's launch also warns: "Fans should be aware that the 2023-24 home kit that features on pitch may subsequently feature a front-of-shirt partner."
This would leave fans having forked out for a shirt that looks different to the one being worn on the pitch.
According to the Mail, Blues insiders have revealed that fans could be sent iron-on sponsor patches, should they strike a new agreement.
Telegraph reporter Matt Law pointed out the flaws, labelling them as "embarrassing".
One fan subsequently wrote: "Starting selling at the end of summer is a terrible decision."
While a second added: "Most fans prefer a shirt without a sponsor now.. however it’s pretty poor that it’s not on sale until after the season starts."
A third tweeted: "In other words make double money as people will buy the kit with nothing on and then the one with a sponsor whenever it does come out."
Many, however, wouldn't mind if the kit remained without a sponsor, with one commenting: "I don’t find it embarrassing, our new shirt looks nice. It’s a win. We can get it in a few weeks. We also know why it’s delayed."
Another added: "I want it without sponsor partner."
Read More on The Sun
Wedding guest finds a dress but trolls say it looks like it’s covered in sweat
Love Island blunder live on After Sun as Maya Jama blasts ‘messed up’ game
A further social media user opined: "It looks even better without the shirt partner. We love this."
Someone else then pointed out: "After the disaster last season I’m intrigued to see so many Chelsea fans supporting the owners in this scenario."
Source: Read Full Article
